On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:00:22PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote: > Thanks, looks cool to me, I'll use that if there are no objections :) > > 2012/5/14 Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com>: > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Nelson Marques <nmo.marq...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> One of the packages I'm submitting for Unknown Horizons support > >> (python-enet or pyenet) has no real version and it's just svn revision > >> 24 (python bindings for ENet); > >> What would be the best way to express this in the spec file? > >> > >> ex: Version: 0.0.0+svn24 > >> > >> Or any other? Opinions most welcome. > > > > One "0" is enough, no need to assume minor and patch versions. Also, I > > think + is a Debian thing, for Fedora it would just be part of the > > release. For a pre-release package.: > > > > Version: 0 > > Release: 0.1.svn24%{?dist} > > > > or something like that, would give: > > > > <package name>-0-0.1.svn24.<dist> > > > > see: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages > > Yep -- we'd want the date in there too like this:
Version: 0 Release: 0.1.20120412svn24%{?dist} -Toshio
pgpMlmb21yTyk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel