On 16 May 2012 20:09, Tomasz Torcz <to...@pipebreaker.pl> wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 06:10:08PM +0100, Jamie Nguyen wrote: >> On 16 May 2012 08:16, Tomasz Torcz <to...@pipebreaker.pl> wrote: >> > Also, implementing socket-activation in nginx would make it upgradable >> > without losing any connections. >> >> Sorry, could you clarify? I don't see how that would help in this situation. >> >> AFAIK, systemd socket activation is useful either for parallelization >> during system startup, or on-demand activation. The former doesn't >> help, and the latter is definitely not what we want for a web server. > > If the new request comes during nginx restart¹, it won't be lost. > Socket is always opened by systemd and the connection will be buffered > until new nginx is ready to server it. > > ¹ in time between old nginx closing its socket and new nginx creating new
Will look into this. Thanks for clarifying! Kind regards, Jamie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
