On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:23 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: > >>> And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really > >>> not a good tool for spec maintenance. > >> > >> Not duplicating the changelog would help. There's little reason to > >> have a changelog in git which is then manually copied into > >> %changelog. > > > > +1, for me - GIT is the authority for change logs, not SPEC... > > -1 changelogs are manually written documents and source files. > A database's (git), temporary meta information is irrelvant.
+1, the changelog is available to the user through an rpm query which is essential and useful to covey what has has been done. Ian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
