On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:28:03PM -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > This should meet the signing requirements and it removes the opacity > without locking down any of Fedora. Such a bootloader should meet > whatever requirements to get signed, since if secureboot is turned on > it wont boot anything at all.
But you're happy to sacrifice the freedom for people to modify the error text that's provided? What's your threshold? -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
