On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net>wrote:
> > this is WRONG behavior > > any upstream-script the next years will use #!/bin/perl and > it would be idiotic to write patches for every application > only becasue fdora decided to make UsrMove > > UsrMove is a distribution-feature > and so the distribution has to care that basic parts > of the ditsribution do the rights things CENTRALIZED > > I'm not a Perl programmer... but shouldn't scripts be using something like #!/usr/bin/env perl rather than hardcoding #!/bin/perl anyway? That's the way Python scripts have been written for years (#!/usr/bin/env python), long before UsrMove. Patching scripts to use the env-style crunchbang makes sense for more reasons then just supporting UsrMove- it would make them more portable in general- so I don't really see why this would be an "idiotic" idea. Ben
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
