Am 06.11.2012 19:48, schrieb Peter Lemenkov: > Hello All. > > 2012/11/6 Matthieu Gautier <mgaut...@fedoraproject.org>: >> For example, if we start from Fedora20 at beginning of 2014: >> - Fedora20(jan 2014) is a stable release. (Fedora18 eol, actual way of >> doing) >> - Fedora21Preview(jul 2014) is an "unstable" release. (Fedora 19 eol) >> - Fedora21(jan 2015) is a stable release. (Fedora21Preview eol, new way >> of doing) >> - Fedora22Preview(jul 2015) >> - Fedora22(jan 2016) (Fedora22Preview and Fedora20 eol) >> - Fedora23Preview(jul 2016) >> - Fedora23(jan 2017) (Fedora23Preview and Fedora21 eol) > > So you not a maintainer but you still suggesting that we, maintainers, > should do 2 times more job by supporting several simultaneous Fedora > versions instead of 3 right now for more than two years. And that's > all just because you think it's a good idea to spend my personal time > on the rreleases I'm not using anymore
it would be enough to push LARGE changes like UsrMove / systemd / grub2 only every SECOND release as we current have and the following release should bring only smaller changes and PLOISH the features of the last release this way you would even have LESS work and pressure and the distribution would become more stable and bugfree at all becasue currently sometimes people do simply now know where to start and how to finish because the next BIG change is starting and a half year is very short
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
