Once upon a time, Przemek Klosowski <przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> said:
> Since busybox package already exists, I think it makes sense to use 
> it--not because we're doing some tiny-linux, but because why not, it's 
> just 651 kB. Most packages we discussed here (openssh-clients, sendmail) 
> are individually much larger than that.

That's not a good reason to use busybox in a general install.  It
doesn't exactly duplicate the commands it offers, only a subset.
-- 
Chris Adams <cmad...@hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to