I will get those packages signed.
Thanks On , Rudolf Kastl wrote: > Another comment: while you keep that repository up id really welcome if you could sign the packages in your private repo. > > 2012/11/29 Rudolf Kastl <che...@gmail.com> > >> Actually the baseurl provided in your paste does not work for me. >> >> here is the fixed entry: baseurl=http://www.edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/$releasever/x86_64/RPMS [6] >> >> 2012/11/29 Edward Mann <e....@edmann.com> >> >>> On , Tom Callaway wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/27/2012 02:47 PM, Edward Mann wrote: >>>> >>>>> I would like to be the maintainer for the Enlightenment e17 for Fedora. I am sending this e-mail to seek guidance and also a sponsor. Getting e17 on Fedora i will need to build and install the following packages eina - Core data structure library. >>>> >>>> In Fedora as "libeina" (I own it) >>>> >>>>> eet - Data encode/decode and storage library. >>>> >>>> In Fedora as "eet" (I own it) >>>> ecore - Core mainloop, display abstraction and utility library. >>>> >>>> In Fedora as "e> eft: 5px; width: 100%;">embryo - Small Pawn based virtual machi >>>> er. edje - Abstract GUI layout and animation object library. efreet - Standards handling for freedesktop.org [1] standards. e_dbus - Dbus wrapping and glue >>>> >>>>> motion, video and audio codec API... ethumb - EThumb, thumbnail generation library... eio - Eio, async I/O library... >>>>> >>>>> I don't think any of these are in Fedora, so they'd be a great place to >>>>> start. Let me know if you need any changes to the four packages I own, >>>>> once you get in the packager group, I'd be happy to let you comaintain them. >>>>> >>>>> ~tom >>>>> >>>>> == >>>>> Fedora Project >>> >>> Thanks for the response Tom. I had searched the packages, however i realized i needed to go one more page in the package list to find those that you own. E17 currently needs all packages to be at the 1.7.2 release. The Enlightenment team plans on keeping them all at the same version number even if some packages have no changes. You probably already know this. >>> >>> I think i remember removing libeina when i installed my build of eina. If we can get libeina up to 1.7.2 then i will adjust the packages to look for libeina and not eina. >>> >>> I have all the packages up on my website http://www.edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/17/ [2] >>> >>> Also i have the yum repo >>> >>> [Enlightenment] >>> name=Enlightenment for Fedora $releasever >>> baseurl=http://edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/$releasever/X86_64/RPMS [3] >>> enabled=1 >>> metadata_expire=7d >>> gpgcheck=0 >>> [Enlightenment - Sources] >>> name=Enlightenment SRPMS for Fedora $releasever >>> baseurl=http://edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/$releasever/SRPMS [4] >>> enabled=1 >>> metadata_expire=7d >>> gpgcheck=0 >>> >>> Right now it's only for x86_64, i will build another vm and do i386 packages. Not sure if that will be needed, but people might come across it and want those. I will also do 18 beta as well. >>> >>> Do i need to make a bug request for each package or is that premature for me to do right now? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> -- >>> devel mailing list >>> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel [5] Links: ------ [1] http://freedesktop.org [2] http://www.edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/17/ [3] http://edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/$releasever/X86_64/RPMS [4] http://edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/$releasever/SRPMS [5] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel [6] http://www.edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/$releasever/x86_64/RPMS
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel