On 12/07/2012 09:56 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Hi Ludwig,
In Ticket 507, that change did not help after all, and will probably
be removed.
It's hard to tell. I'm having some problems getting reliable reports.
We are working on that.
As far as I can tell, this is the only option we have for ticket 509.
Any locking is going to be worse than doing some sort of lock-free access.
Mark
On 12/07/2012 11:50 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi Mark,
for ticket 507 you replaced rw locks with mutex locks, now for the
backend you replace mutex locks with rw locks ? any reason why these
are better here ?
Regards,
Ludwig
On 12/07/2012 05:48 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/509
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/509/0001-Ticket-509-lock-free-access-to-be-be_suffixlock.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
