Am 08.12.2012 17:25, schrieb Bruno Wolff III: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 08:12:24 -0800, > Arun SAG <saga...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Not really! We are already a customer of RHEL. Money is not the problem. We >> want our users to use the latest software out there but we also want to >> reduce the upgrade cycle. >> >> You CANNOT disturb every developer in a company to upgrade his box every 6 >> months. > > > Those are somewhat conflicting requirements. Maybe RHEL plus a local repo for > packages you need more up to date > than what is provided for in RHEL would work for you.
this does not work a few years after RHEL release you will be unable for many "local builds" because build requirements does not fit and it is hardly possible to fullfil them and update a lot of depending libraries also with local builds without collide/break with the rest of the distribution
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
