On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 04:47:58PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:42:14AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> > However, you also miss my point. Adam's message was saying that the
> > guidelines forced people to use libexecdir and then went on to point out the
> > drawbacks of forcing specifically libexecdir on upstreams that didn't have
> > that
> > coded in. So, as I said, in that context it's meaningless to bring up
> > arguments that are only addressed to libexecdir because %{_libdir} is an
> > alternative.
>
> I think you miss my point. Where consistency across architectures is
> desired, %{_libdir} isn't an option, so in the absence of an exception
> the guidelines force people to use libexec.
>
Please re-read my email to see how I addressed your concerns in my first
paragraph. This paragraph was to show how my email was responding to the
context in Adam's email.-Toshio
pgpjQ41lPkL75.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
