On 01/31/2013 02:04 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
And it's the same situation as with MariaDB and MySQL. Fedora is going to
prefer MariaDB (FESCo stated it clearly yesterday) - so we should try to make
an effort to support MariaDB and not for example force users to use both just
to run system. But on the other hand - if there's someone (and both are from
upstream), who's going to take a burden of maintainance - why not? It can
fail, they will loose interest one day - yes, could happen. And there's
possibility that these projects even coming from same roots will diverge and
become totally different projects...
"Fedora is going to prefer MariaDB (FESCo stated it clearly yesterday)"
It did now? If that's the case then I would like a full fledge statement
from FESCO saying so and a discussion what is supposed to be the
distribution "default" database and promote postgresql as an candidate
to take that part thus leaving our users out of yet another sunacle
fiasco...
As I understood it on the fesco meeting which I was present to btw that
it was more like Fedora will only ship mariadb if no one will pick up
mantainership of mysql and thus obsoleting mysql as an result of that (
followed by a discussion what be the best way to do that )...
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
