On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 09:34 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote: > > > 2013/2/1 Martin Sourada <martin.sour...@gmail.com> > > Yes, defaults needs to be sensible and usable and for many > people > that's what they end up with. I'm not saying we should go and > have AOO > installed by default, but available in repos in a state that > does not > conflict with LO (and other office suites *in official > repos*) ;-) Think > about sysadmins, multi-user systems, ... Seeing a bug report > saying "My > LO Writer segfaults with this error while AOO is installed" > isn't > exactly helpful, but not having AOO isn't a solution. Hence I > say OK to > adding AOO, as long as it wont conflict with LO both as > package and in > runtime. > > Unlike pulseaudio (in the above linked thread), AOO is > end-user GUI application, not a > library/daemon/sound-server/whatever > used to get the wanted sound to your headphones (that by > design > interferes with anything else trying to do the same) ;-) By > adding AOO > we're not breaking some third app, we might break LO and > that's exactly > what I consider critical not to do. Is it doable? Are there > people > willing and able to do that? If yes, sure, let them.
> +1 Martin, that's the point. No that's completely not the point: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/177803.html Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
