Am 15.04.2013 18:48, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net > <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote: > > which raises the question again: > > would it be not the better way to build the whole distribution hardened > by expierience that nearly anything is exploitable over the long and > performance comes after security > > > The logical conclusion from this is to move to a language with automatic > memory management. The "top > vulnerability" reports for programs written in C/C++ and most other languages > so different that starting a new > project that processes untrusted data in C/C++ is becoming indefensible.
no, that would mean thow away a lot of code and a hurry rewrite of whatelse in whatever language doe snot make things secure > We seem to be stuck with C as the lowest common denominator that can be used > from any runtime; long-term we _need_ > to move away from that, or Linux will gain the reputation of least-secure OS > around. not really, proven by securityfocus lists and changelogs of many Fedora apckages which are not in C/C++ a fool will always implement unsecure software and look at java-applets the last year! > Now, what to move to? I currently don't have see any language/runtime I > could recommend, which is in itself rather > frightening and that is why existing technologies to make binaries more secure should be used
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
