On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 16:42 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > If they do decide to keep the change, you could escalate it to FESCo. > However, (speaking only for myself here) I would be VERY reluctant to > override maintainers on their packages on something that is a design > decision/judgement call. Where would we draw the line?
Surely that is part of what FESCo is *for*? To give "guidance" when a single package wants to do something that's inconsistent with what users expect and what every other package in the distribution does. That was my understanding when I served as part of FESCo. Perhaps things have changed since then? -- dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
