On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:09:57PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > On the other hand, having NetworkManager available all the time enables > > things like management tools to use its API to query system status, > > instead of guessing it from kernel information and heuristic analysis of > > some files under /etc. > > Exactly. And that's why we want to enhance NetworkManager to make > people *want* to use it instead of turning it off.
Features I am missing are: - A possibility to make NM ignore an interface from the management tools, which would allow to normally use NM but disable it if one wants to configure a device on the command line. Having to disable interfaces from /etc/sysconfig to be able to use them without NM interfering makes it more cumbersome to use NM at all. - Support NM not interfering with Wi-Fi attack tools such as aircrack-ng, which might only be possible by ignoring the device completely or by adding support to change devices into monitor mode and select static of changing frequencies etc. Probably the features airmon-ng provides would be necessary. - Allow to create tun/tap devices, especially persisted ones with permissions for users Should I file RFEs for these in Red Hat Bugzilla or is there a better place to communicate them to? Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
