Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Billy Crook <billycr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Please voice yourself at meetings in #fedora-devel if this is important to > > you. > > (Speaking purely for myself and not for other FESCo members,) I do > want to hear from Fedora contributors - but I'd much rather hear on > the mailing list (where messages arrive over the course of a week or > more) rather than during the FESCo meeting (when we have only a few > minutes to agree on a decision, and already frequently have two or > three parallel subconversations).
I agree with this statement. In terms of this feature as presented, I'm not seeing why having $MTA in the minimal install where you need the installer to have a required configury step for it is a proper use of everyone's time that's installing it. Enterprise administrators are almost certainly pushing out their own configurations directly via puppet/chef/ansible/etc. Desktop users are primarily doing it as part of their MUA setup, or just using webmail. It's not as if the default MTA configuration, as I understand it (no smart host, attempt to send all mail directly with the FQDN) is generally useful OOTB. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
