Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 21:58, Robert Marcano a écrit : > The real problem with publishing things is that if I distribute binaries > of many things I must follow the license, some say I need to distribute > sources, some say that I need to distribute a copy of the license, etc. > Making files downloadable by default adds to the distributor more work > (legal) because they must comply with their licenses. So if I put an > open service of an Apache licensed web application, I will start > distributing fonts with other licenses without ever noticing, for > example GPL+3 (nothing against any license, only examples of the things > people should care when distributing free/open licensed code/assets)
Again, the fonts available in Fedora are carefully vetted and none of them have redistribution restrictions (and even for those with GPLish licenses a large part of the font community considers the font file is the font source, so you can't redistribute one without the other) I understand your point but please take another example. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
