On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 00:29 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Oh no! Another one of those threads... ;-) > > Well, a comment from Thomas Moschny inspired me to examine "Obsoletes" > tags in our package collection a bit.
I have openssl and fipscheck obsoletes on the list. They were added because the base openssl (and fipscheck) package was split into openssl-libs and openssl subpackages where only the openssl-libs is needed unless something requires the openssl command to work. I've added the obsoletes into the openssl-libs on the old (non-split) openssl package according to the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages But once you install the new split openssl package it should not be obsoleted by openssl-libs so I think the obsoletes are correct. -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb (You'll never know whether the road is wrong though.) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
