Dne 23.8.2013 10:24, Peter Robinson napsal(a):
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Matthew Miller
<mat...@fedoraproject.org <mailto:mat...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:08:18PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > What things we do _now_ could be
> > improved with the investment of some effort?
> Perl rebuild always take a lot of time, and as a result it will
affect
> the mass rebuild.
Apparently less so with all the new ARM builders, right? Is this
something
you're saying could be improved, or is it just something we always
need to
budget time for?
The perl upgrade process is some what manual and there's a whole bunch
of circular dependencies that cause/require a bunch of manual
bootstrapping of certain packages so the perl mass rebuild is some
what different to a standard all in mass rebuild.
Peter
The same applies for Ruby. It is definitely not just "fire the rebuild
and forget". During the process, there is typically need to update some
packages to be compatible with latest release, some were FTBFS already
before, some others need bootstrap due to circular dependencies.
Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
