Hi, On 09/12/2013 02:12 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:42:20 +0200, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >> I'm afraid that's just adds additional work for maintainers w/o any >> visible benefits. > > The benefits are the stable Fedora release does not break 3rd party > applications during its deployment/lifecycle. > > >> Let's move further instead of backporting - that's just a leafnode app so >> nobody got hurt by a potential dependency issue. > > wireshark.rpm contains many commandline utilities which may be used by > 3rd party sysadmin scripts (and maybe even 3rd party C applications).
Correct. > > "further" in your explanation means nullifying the long Fedora alpha/beta > release engineering and also nullifying the upstream efforts to release 1.8.x > versions even after 1.10.0 had been already released. Agree. > > <joke> > So let's drop the Fedora releases effort and we can all just run Rawhide. > </joke> Actually, this will make "living" releases of Fedora kind of Rawhide. As stated in former mail, it would be good to do 1.8.10 upgrade in Fedora 18. > > Regards, > Jan > -- Peter Hatina ENG Server Experience, System Management Red Hat Czech, Brno -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
