On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 08:27:52PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > However, ATLAS still has different flavors for different CPUs (e.g.
> > 3dnow, sse, sse2, sse3 etc). I'm not sure if this can be easily handled
> > with alternatives.
> Please don't [to ATLAS upstream, not Susi] do this.  It breaks all
> sorts of scenarios, especially virtual machine migration or simply
> moving hard disks from one physical machine to another.
> Arrange your code so it chooses the best available routines when the
> program starts up, and compile every feasible alternative into the
> binary.  Or use kernel vdso/user-helper functions when that is
> applicable.

Actually, what ATLAS upstream intends is for the program to be recompiled on
every installation (or boot, even). I think we used to have packages that
did that; this is a compromise.


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mat...@fedoraproject.org>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to