On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 01:15:26PM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: > Not to be only negative here, take a look at the COPR initiative, I expect > it will solve the problem you are talking about by offering external > repositories that will be easily reachable from Fedora but won't be a part > of the Fedora itself. The content of these repositories will be governed > by the same law as Fedora packages are (SW patents, ...) but technical > policies should be a lot less strict. > Would that address your concerns?
I won't speak for Michael, but I think the answer is no. COPRs fills a need, but it's _too_ wild west (no package signatures, for example). We need to support multiple language runtimes and native upstream packaging *in* Fedora. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mat...@fedoraproject.org> -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
