-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:12:40 +0200 Jan Zelený <jzel...@redhat.com> escribió: > On 18. 10. 2013 at 09:35:36, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 09:19:30AM +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote: > > > On 10/16/2013 11:13 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > >* Need to clarify if the DNF bindings will exist for both > > > >python2 and > > > > > > > > python3 or just python3. This could affect releng, mock > > > > maintainer, etc. > > > > > > Until Anaconda is in Python 2, DNF will support both Py2 and Py3. > > > Once Anaconda switches to Py3 DNF will officially drop support for > > > Py2. Same for hawkey. > > > > > > At least that's the plan but we have no problem prolonging the > > > Py2/Py3 period for a Fedora release or two. Though it would be > > > very preferable to have a solid set date. > > > > Okay -- deciding on that date will likely also need to coordinate > > with releng, fedpkg maintainers (dgilmore who is also releng), and > > the mock maintainers. There may be other projects I'm not thinking > > of (yum-utils and createrepo are going to be ported to DNF-python3 > > by the packaging team already? ) I'm concerned about the tools > > used to build fedora and the tools used by package maintainers and > > testers to create packages. > > Some of them will be rewritten to Py3 but for example createrepo has > now a C implementation and we are planning for that one to be the > default. we can not change to createreo_c without making sure it has feature parity first. While some releng tools call createreo and can be changed easily, there is also some using the python api. Right now it also does not have any deltarpm support, which is critical for our adoption.
> > Oh also -- I've been assuming that the DNF python2 bindings will be > > compatible with the yum API. Is that the case? > > Sort of. The problem is that while yum has some sort of API, there is > no official and well documented one, therefore some plugins and tools > built on top of yum use some of its internals. The plan in this area > is to define an API as similar to the old one as possible well before > F21 and then dedicate one whole release to adapt tools using yum to > dnf. > > Does that make sense? sure, hopefully all the releng tools are not using yum internals Dennis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSZOEvAAoJEH7ltONmPFDR1ecQALYwN11L4AUoRoCpxJWoMIfr /gxpJ8vtwsnd04x2x5qlTa5dkAdQ+WlFVbBkCWrUuZ0Iv97/kayryWOKIH8WWpDV tEl9iF2JWqik3ZDCamRGBo7TIePgyKjEQY2AzYF9gXEOPABBEIfoVpxTnlHPLi7x yvzQFJ9FT/wR1OiSGWklyfNRixHpLZpjJq5P1BjAR+daqElt9wrXe3RPCzEZo3Ye aNUER0pTu0KLVHknTqTBr74Unwh5Ox1+B7bSS47Ue2/VSwLBDTyC9vN8TbJ6HJqK pqRrLOHBXy/ouRRjy66ovsDQUzKoYtfmGeYXfKFCkIH02z6VWRHLklVUHRIEuTb9 QG6hcboLJJdUI5F3at5EJGBqgWQ1qyHuS34eJhN0GnODNl1efkVINzH8dY00KAya 5u9KaswrhY4uhbA0y3X+kA0LbO2TtSmprvj+zZaeL+Q+Hsljuz6tO9F+ACs32LSm 7/7v4o5iGXBsDoE1ks5NZn1CWdX4sH7BlmkCAqi8TMjod87OQ6qcmCGgREFO4w6Y y3wYsPq/UlwR9NRyUyjyCrp00Zw9cWc8UNH0ZVUsFcqxYkfW4nEH3JIc1w/FdVu/ WDjS4oqXZ/ynMuJjOEPIT4udh4Ov+S0j1ULSuL3jINJT16uRkI6Ige3P7X4Xo/Qh +UFWQ3MAanoOYG5t7R8B =XGLC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
