Quoting Jiri Vanek (2013-10-21 18:45:46)
> Hi all!
> 
> With 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.3.0.fc20
>  beeing stable, 
> would like to make this more visible:
> 
> The jdk in Fedora, being inspired in Debian, now supports headless version. 
> During the life of F20 
> (as in f21 all expected packages should be correctly headless)i would like to 
> recommend all java 
> packages maintainers, who do not need audio, or X or whatever (this is still 
> "on QA" on our side) 
> to swap theirs dependence to java-headless.
> Alos, maintainers, please do not forget, that when you update your package, 
> also packages you are 
> depending on must become "just hedless dependent". Anyway - all libraries 
> should be jut java-headless :)
> 
> I would like to suggest especially wildFly and tomcat to try to migrate asap, 
> as this change was 
> designed for them :)

They can't. Several reasons:

    * Packaging guidelines clearly state BR/R: java
    * Maven packages have automatically generated requires on java (or
      java-devel)

To *really* make use of java-headless few things need to happen:
    * guidelines have to be updated
    * java-packages have to be changed to R: java-headless by default
    * Maven packages are rebuilt
    * packages not built with maven are migrated manually
    * leaf applications make sure they have R: java

> Btw - the update above is now somehow stuck - it not in testing, nor in 
> updates. Maybe the relengs 
> can help.

If you need to get in touch with rel-engs file a ticket[1], don't CC their ML or
it's going to get lost

[1] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/

-- 
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni...@redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Developer Experience

PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to