On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:52:11PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:16:23AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:05:22PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:19:12PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > > #topic #1193 reboots for all updates -- are we ready for this? > > > > .fesco 1193 > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1193 > > > > > > Didn't this terrible idea die already? > > > > > Do you have a link to the discussion/decision for this? > > > > I've been looking around for the prior discussion and thus far I've found: > > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/869 > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F18_release_announcement?stF18#For_systems_administrators > > > > (Base feature approved for F18.) > > Previous discussion: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-June/thread.html#168689 > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-February/thread.html#178112 > Thanks.
Those seem to be discussion of the cons and pros, though, rather than a decision. So the discussion is relevant in that one of the important compromise points was that previously it only applied to a subset of updates but nothing says that the idea was "dead" as in rejected for Fedora, correct? In other words, I just want to make sure status quo before AppInstaller is that Offline Updates are live on Fedora's Gnome Desktop but only for "OS Components"? -Toshio
pgpsETvhTaSqz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
