On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Przemek Klosowski
<przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote:
> Another point:  it shouldn't be hardwired into the package manager but
> rather result from package properties. I can see several ways to do it:
>  - an 'essentiality' property in the RPM file
>  - a yum/dnf configuration file specifying a set of protected packages
>  - a special, unremovable 'system' package that depends on kernel and dnf
YAGNI?  Abstractions are useful only when we actually have a
difference to abstract.  (Perhaps we will have that difference with
Fedora.next, but we don't seem to have it now.)
     Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to