Am 09.01.2014 16:37, schrieb Jiri Moskovcak: > On 01/09/2014 04:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 09.01.2014 16:03, schrieb Jiri Moskovcak: >>>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310 >>>> >>>> After asking on the bugzilla it seems that ales would like people who >>>> want this change to cc themselves on the bug report. If the cc reaches >>>> 40 he'll reconsider. Kinda a strange way of deciding but whatever works >>>> for the maintainer I guess. >>>> >>> >>> And what would be the right way to decide? And please stay assured that >>> this is not a trolling, >>> I would really like to see some agreement in Fedora on how to decide these >>> kind of things. >> >> in doubt in case of rewrites support the existing features and start >> the clean codebase with them in mind > > And that is official Fedora (I mean respected by the community) rule or yours?
mine - there is no "official" one and hardly will ever be that is what a user normally expects: optimize things, add new features but do not demand him to change his workflow with no for the user obvious improvement
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
