On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 16:56 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > As a side note, it also needs to be discussed how such a key feature of > > the bluetooth stack could go unnoticed through QA, and how to avoid this > > from happening again. > > Indeed. I wondered the same myself.
I'm somewhat cheered that our product has apparently reached the quality level where people consider a Bluetooth audio profile to be a 'key feature', but so far as our QA standards are concerned, it ain't. This didn't really 'pass unnoticed' through QA. I noticed it, and was supremely unconcerned. Yes, if you depend on this specific feature it sucks, but it's hardly unusual for some specific feature of something or other to break between Fedora releases. It's a thing that happens, and as I'm on record as arguing in more extensive and generic terms, the nature of Fedora as a project would need to change quite a lot before we decided we were a project where stuff like this didn't sometimes break. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
