On Jan 26, 2014, at 4:55 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
> > > Am 27.01.2014 00:51, schrieb Chris Murphy: >> On Jan 26, 2014, at 4:29 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: >> >>> do yourself and everybody a favour and >>> >>> * don't claim others are rude while you talk like above and worser half of >>> the thread >>> * don't talk about things above your technical scope >>> * discuss with software engineers while lacking basic understanding of the >>> topic >>> >>> posts like yours in that thread belongs to the users list and *not* to a >>> development list >> >> Request declined. >> >> You are the only person who has suggested a method of rollbacks that >> fundamentally would not work > > are you drunken? I haven't had anything to drink in 24+ hours, but this seems off topic. > > i have *not* requested any method of rollback You gave several examples of rollback-snapshot methods - same thing as you suggested them. I never said you requested them. > > i just gave a few warnings what problems has to be considered if rollbacks > of snapshots are taken as possible solution - so *stop* talk to threads if > you have no clue about the topic and about who said what Yes, problems as a result of improper rollback methods. I will not stop challenging junk suggestions which you then use to cast a wide net to argue against all forms of snapshotting and rollback. It's absurd argumentation. > * read what others said > * start at the begin of the thread doing that > * try to understand what you read before commetn any word > * look at the *context* of several posts becaus eoyu need that information to > understand > * after that claim what people suggested or in reality you would say nothing > at all Take your own advice. I've been following the thread from the very start, and your snapshot-rollback examples are all junk. Just for instance: On Jan 26, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > * restore a snapshot of /usr and you have fun with /var/lib/rpm > * restore a snapshot of /var/lib/ without /usr and you have fun with the > rpmdb and others > * restore a snapshot of /usr without /etc and you *may have* random fun Only you have come up with such utterly implausible examples of snapshot-rollback behavior and then chosen to argue against *all* possible snapshot-rollbacks in general. No one would do rollbacks the way you describe above. It would almost certainly break the system. Chris Murphy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
