On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > I've just published a blogpost that summarizes what's going on with Python > 3 as default in Fedora. > > You can find it here: > > http://eng.hroncok.cz/2014/02/12/python3-fedora-default/ > > Feel free to post any comments on my blog or here on the mailing list(s) Basic process question: do existing packages that currently offer only Python 2 support, but for which upstream has subsequently added Python 3 compatibility, follow the normal new package / full review process if you're adding Python 3 support as a subpackage to the existing spec file? (I'm working on python-rdflib at the moment, which fits this criteria). I would assume so, but didn't find an explicit statement one way or another in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python . As I suspect this will be a common case with a push for Python 3 as default, I'll be happy to add a corresponding statement to that page.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
