On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 02:32:40PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Hmm, I like this alternative a lot. I'm probably taking this too > far, but I'm thinking of: > > fail2ban-server - core components with minimal deps > > fail2ban-firewalld - firewalld support/configuration - requires firewalld > fail2ban-hostsdeny - tcp_wrappers hosts.deny support - requires tcp_wrappers > fail2ban-mail - mail actions - requires /usr/bin/mail > fail2ban-sendmail - sendmail actions - requires > /usr/sbin/sendmail > fail2ban-shorewall - shorewall support - requires shorewall > fail2ban-systemd - systemd journal configuration > > fail2ban - default component - installs -firewalld,-sendmail,-systemd > fail2ban-all - installs everything - also requires /usr/bin/whois > > Comments?
That _might_ be going overboard. But it certainly does allow a lot of flexibility. Somewhere there is a balance between that flexibility and the extra packaging work and potential user confusion, and I'm not exactly sure where that line is in this case. :) (Call the last one -journald or -systemd-journald by the way -- otherwise, people will expect the unit files to be there.) -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mat...@fedoraproject.org> -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
