Adam Williamson wrote:
> just to note the facts: this issue could have been resolved much faster,
> and SELinux is not the reason why it wasn't.
But SELinux is the reason the bug was there in the first place. Without
SELinux, we wouldn't have had this bug! (Systems without SELinux were not
affected, because the broken workaround was only used on systems where
allocating the JIT memory normally doesn't work.) Nor the two (separate)
critical regressions that plagued F20 and Rawhide recently.
Kevin Kofler
PS: Et ceterum censeo SELinux esse delendum.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
