On 03/31/2014 01:00 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Base is common platform for products but it does not mean everything has
to be used by other products or everything has to follow base path (for
example installer is part of Base as we agreed but it can diverge a lot
over products, and even it would not be used in all products explicitely
just to provide images - cloud). Of course if some technology gets
obsoleted/deprecated by most of products, it means the time to deprecate
it in Base comes (or change of the owner). So common sense, not exact
numbers:).

You do realize that the size of the base needs to be bound to the lowest common denominator between current and future multiple products to make it this kind of proposal work now and in the future right?

That immediately binds it and limit it to the size of embedded ( Embedded --> Cloud/Containers --> Servers --> Workstation/Desktop/Laptop whatever else ) to relevant packages for embedded within those 1806 components that make up the self hosting Fedora base since there seemed there had been reached a perfectly logical consensus to limit what makes up the baseWG from those self hosting 1806 component.

Nor can you introduce components to be shared among WG outside the self hosting components of the baseWG and I'm quite frankly a bit stunned if Philipp Knirsch and the rest of the baseWG agreed to do that since by doing so they invalidate their own logical approach of building and limit baseWG to self hosting components.

JBG

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to