On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:04 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > 2014-04-22 15:10 GMT+02:00 Simo Sorce <s...@redhat.com>: > > > A good protocol would allow to send a first small > > packet that establish a connection and a reply that can "push back" on > > the client w/o requiring huge bandwidth to be spent. > > > > Isn't that an inherent capability of TCP?
Sure, that's one way when bandwidth is the issue. There are other issues though, and just closing the connection on the client if you do not want any traffic is a bit blunt. It also does not give the client any idea when it is ok to retry. > If it is not automatic, maybe it would only be up to the log receiver to > appropriately decrease the receive buffers on their incoming sockets? This is not a problem I care, the kernel already does it quite well. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
