I'm primarily referring to development compilation, not necessarily packaging.  

The default CFLAGS cause clang to fail 'out of the gate'.  Given the popularity 
rise in the compiler, and the increase # of open tickets upstream around this 
issue, I think it prudent that we address.  

Not to change the whole packaging infrastructure, just so developers can 
install the tools and test their builds. 

Cheers,
Tim

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jakub Jelinek" <ja...@redhat.com>
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" 
> <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Cc: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" 
> <packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 4:03:57 AM
> Subject: Re: fedoras default cflags & clang
> 
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:25:28AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On 05/29/2014 10:28 PM, Tim St Clair wrote:
> > >I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles:
> > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282
> > >
> > >Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various
> > >reasons, is there anyone who knows a workaround or fix?
> > 
> > I think FPC (and/or FESCO) should decide on whether we want to
> > allow/disallow using clang for official Fedora rpms.
> 
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/847
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-05-14/fesco.2012-05-14-17.00.log.html
> 
> ?
> 
>       Jakub
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

-- 
Cheers,
Tim
Freedom, Features, Friends, First -> Fedora
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/bigdata
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to