On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:11:53 +0200 > drago01 <drag...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That wasn't about "poor" as in slow vs. "great" as in fast but >> bandwith capped vs. not. >> >> If building deltas are slow the solution is not to disable them but to >> find out why there are slow and fix that. One thing for instance is >> that it insists on generating the original rpm while creating an >> uncompressed rpm would save a compress + uncompressed cycle during >> updates (the former is a bit extensive for xz). > > I think It could avoid doing that if people didn't mind that it couldn't > be gpg checked.
It may also be possible to compress-and-sign them on the fly. If the gpg check can be done incrementally, you could compress the rpm to /dev/null and gradually compute the signature. That leaves you a signature to check and a ready-to-install rpm you don't need to uncompress again. > kevin > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
