On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 01:20:26AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> wrote: > > Maintaining software in general is a burden, but we do it for the > > benefit of our users anyway. The best case scenario would certainly be > > for Google to update their packages, but if they don't then how does > > rendering the package uninstallable benefit our users who want to > > install it? > > I don't think they "don't" if you could give google-chrome-unstable a try.
I don't follow. My understanding was that all the Chrome builds were generic RPMs rather than tracking a specific branch of Fedora, so how does the rate of development releases do anything to help us get them to update their packages to build against a more recent gcrypt? -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
