On 08/26/2014 05:02 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
----- Original Message -----
I don't have any major objections to this, but I will note that
reports stopped being sent to FESCo because at some point they were
kind of redundant.  "Still working on thing X" every week isn't really
something that needs to be sent.  So I would avoid a weekly deadline
and maybe just post minutes/summaries of the meetings the groups have
when there is actually something to communicate.

It seems to me that what we technically need, and what would solve this problem 
as well, is to have the meeting minutes be actually useful.  As great as 
meetbot is, it takes effort to use it to produce really good meeting minutes, 
and the default output has a lot of output that makes everyone’s eyes glaze 
over.

Ultimately the solution to both the reports and meetbot is the same—human 
editing—but I guess that a good summary for other WGs would be more or less 
equivalent to good meeting minutes (assuming that the obviously internal-only 
“implementation status” topics would be easy to recognize and skip)

Right, I like the idea of making the meeting minutes nice and utilize meetbot functions more than we do now. That should cover the meeting part of the discussion quiet effectively.

However, some interesting talks are sometimes not discussed during meeting (not all groups actually hold meetings regularly), because they are covered on group's mailing list already enough. And I'm not sure if summarizing those in the beginning of the meeting would work.

Honza

     Mirek
_______________________________________________
env-and-stacks mailing list
env-and-sta...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks


--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to