On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 14:10 +0200, drago01 wrote: > As written today you should ask for an exception ... but I agree that > the policy needs to be revised.
A good start to revising it is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/208 e.g. ==> If a service is enabled by default after installation and has both a socket activated and a non-socket activated unit file set, then it SHOULD enable the socket activated version and leave the non-socket activated unit file off. (But the packager might choose not to do this if he has good reasons for it.) <== But that ticket hasn't been touched since it was filed in 2012. Tim. */
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
