On 09/24/2014 07:42 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
the “-p /sbin/ldconfig” syntax triggers a special behavior in RPM /if
the scriptlet is otherwise empty/. In your case, the “%post libs”
scriptlet also actually, surprising as it may seem, includes the
following lines:
##-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
## All %files should be placed here and keep them sorted
##
and hence is not empty. So RPM skips the special behavior, and
executes /sbin/ldconfig with the usual additional value of $1 as
described in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets?rd=Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
.
Mirek,
Thanks for your quick reply. I think it should be intelligent enough to
ignore comments as comments are supported in spec file. Looks like a bug
to me.
What you have done is a correct workaround, though by bypassing the
special treatment of /sbin/ldconfig the package installation will be
somewhat less efficient because /sbin/ldconfig will be executed more
times than necessary. Another, more efficient, but more difficult to
maintain, alternative is to avoid comments within the scriptlet
sections by somehow reordering the spec file.
Mirek
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi All,
Recently we came across a issue i.e. bz [1] , where ldconfig
returned error as below on Fedora 20 machine (same issue is
present in other Fedora variants too).
/"yum remove glusterfs-libs" giving some Non-fatal POSTUN scriptlet failure.
/sbin/ldconfig: relative path `0' used to build cache
warning: %postun(glusterfs-libs-3.6.0-0.1.beta1.fc20.x86_64) scriptlet
failed, exit status 1
Non-fatal POSTUN scriptlet failure in rpm package
glusterfs-libs-3.6.0-0.1.beta1.fc20.x86_64/
The fix to this issue is replacing "%post libs-p /sbin/ldconfig"
in to two lines [3]. But according to Fedora documentation [2]
"%post libs-p /sbin/ldconfig" is the right way to do it. Which is
not working for us. Seems like it is changed now but the
documentation is not updated.
Thoughts?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145992
[2]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Shared_libraries
[3] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8836/2/glusterfs.spec.in
Thanks,
Lala
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
