On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:32:42 +0200 > Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue 07 Oct 2014 01:50:46 PM CEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 04:43:53PM -0400, Rich Mattes wrote: > > >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > > >> <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > > >> > > >> Dear all, > > >> > > >> A long desired and awaited feature for pkgdb2 is the > > >> possibility to have FAS > > >> groups maintain packages. > > >> > > >> Hooray!A Thanks for this, I'm going to start testing it with > > >> the robotics-sig FAS group and some of my packages. > > > > > > Awesome! > > > > > >> I put together some instructions on the requirements and > > >> steps: http://pkgdb2.readthedocs.org/en/latest/groups.html > > >> > > >> I followed the above instructions to update the FAS group, but > > >> I have a question about one of the requirements.A The > > >> instructions say that the mailing list for the group needs to have > > >> a rhbz account.A As far as I know bugzilla sends a confirmation > > >> email during the account creation process.A This seems kind of > > >> iffy when the email address is for a public list: should I just > > >> create the account and try to be the first list subscriber to > > >> click the confirmation link?A Or is there another way to create a > > >> bugzilla account for SIG mailing lists? > > > > > > That's a good question. I guess I approached with the idea that the > > > list would be new as well. So eventually, you would be the only one > > > subscribed to it and thus the question is simple(r) to answer. > > > But for the case of an existing list, I wonder if we can do better > > > than what you describe. > > > @Kevin any thoughts on this? > > > > This is normally done by sending an email to > > bugzilla-reque...@redhat.com and requesting creation of "pseudo" user > > with email being the mailing list. Of course there would be no real > > control over this pseudo user. > > I was thinking we would create a new list for each of these groups. > These lists would be private (because they could contain private bugs > assigned to the group). Then we could also filter on bugzilla password > changes to catch those in moderation, or just let them through to the > list since the list is private and only has on it trusted folks in the > group. > > We could ask for pseudo users as well, but I've never done so, so not > sure how long that takes, etc. > > I don't anticipate any issues requiring private bugs given the scope of our work, so making a new private mailing list doesn't seem too enticing. It might be easier to use the public mailing list, and just not assign watchbugzilla and watchcommits to the pkgdb group. I will bounce it off of the robotics sig list, and if we do end up asking for a pseudo user on bugzilla I'll report back with how long it took and any other issues. Rich
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
