On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:28:16AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > A few specific comments that have been made on the Board ticket (to > avoid rehashing them). > > * "Fedora Server 21" sounds like we've had 21 releases of Fedora Server > and we certainly haven't. > * Should we start all of the Products at version 1 and say "built on the > Fedora 21 platform"?
My opinion is that since we've decided on a unified lifecycle and release process for now, we should reflect that in the names, so: Fedora 21 Cloud Fedora 21 Server Fedora 21 Workstation but that we should also allow unversioned naming: Fedora Cloud Fedora Server Fedora Workstation In the future, if we have separated release cycles, I think separate numbering might make sense, with the "Built on the Fedora 21 platform" wording or similar. Possibily date-based schemes for the products — but I don't want to get the cart too far ahead of the horse on that. > > Anyway, we need to have a consistent branding decision made for the > release (and for the Ambassadors). So please come prepared to find a > consensus (not to win a fight). > > > [1] https://fedorahosted.org/board/ticket/11 > -- > desktop mailing list > desk...@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
