Jan Zelený <jzel...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 15. 11. 2014 at 14:51:32, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Jan Silhan wrote: > > >> 3. The page says "The depsolver may offer to treat the weak like very > > >> weak relations or the other way round" does dnf do that? or not? > > > > > > DNF doesn't do that and never will. IMO that would be too hackish > > > behavior. > > > > It's not "hackish", it's "configurable". Letting the user decide whether > > they want to have weak dependencies installed or not is part of the whole > > point of having them. > > I believe there is a misunderstanding there. It should be possible to "move > the bar" of what's going to be selected for installation. I believe what > Honza > was referring to is that dnf will not support cases where it would swap the > semantics of weak and very weak deps (i.e. treat Recommends as Suggests and > vice versa).
Yeah, doing both at once would be rather crazy. The quoted sentence says "or", not "and". Björn Persson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
