On 9 December 2014 at 10:27, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:59 PM, William B <will...@firstyear.id.au> > wrote: > > > The true crux of this issue is the over complexity that firewalld has > brought to fedora, and the fact that a quality UI for managing it does not > exist yet. > > > > OSX solves this issue by having an "on or off" button, and a list of > applications that are allowed access. When the application first requests > access, a prompt is given to add the application to the allow list. Why are > we so against such a UI? > > > OS X's firewall is disabled by default. Where's the outcry? > > It was a long time ago and it basically caused it to have extra configurations before it could be 'ok'd' for various corporate and government sites. Not something Fedora Workstation is aiming at. -- Stephen J Smoogen.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
