On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 27 January 2015 at 10:15, Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ok, I might be asking a completely stupid question here... >> >> Why move production stuff over to dnf at all? Isn't dnf's goal in life to >> eventually become yum? If dnf is "good enough" to start using it in >> production, should the discussion be around dnf -> yum transition? >> >> > I think that was dropped a long time ago. dnf isn't going to become yum in > some sort of rename. It will be a seperate command and while its syntax > will be similar it is not 100% (eg you won't be able to use a yum plugin to > work with dnf) > Ahh, I hadn't seen that. Well, since the name is no longer temporary I would like to say that it's a terrible name :) Ok sorry for the noise, please continue. Thanks, Richard
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
