----- Original Message ----- > From: "Neal Becker" <ndbeck...@gmail.com> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, February 9, 2015 3:08:17 PM > Subject: another dnf kernel issue? > > [nbecker@nbecker1 ~]$ sudo dnf remove kernel*3.18.3* > [sudo] password for nbecker: > No match for argument: kernel*3.18.3* > Error: No packages marked for removal. > [nbecker@nbecker1 ~]$ sudo dnf remove kernel*3.18.3-201.fc21 > No match for argument: kernel*3.18.3-201.fc21 > Error: No packages marked for removal. > [nbecker@nbecker1 ~]$ sudo yum remove kernel*3.18.3-201.fc21 > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, merge-conf, versionlock > Repodata is over 2 weeks old. Install yum-cron? Or run: yum makecache fast > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package kernel-core.x86_64 0:3.18.3-201.fc21 will be erased > ---> Package kernel-modules.x86_64 0:3.18.3-201.fc21 will be erased > ---> Package kernel-modules-extra.x86_64 0:3.18.3-201.fc21 will be erased > --> Finished Dependency Resolution
Does "sudo dnf remove kernel*-3.18.3*" work for you? From the DNF's persepective (http://dnf.readthedocs.org/en/latest/command_ref.html#specifying-packages), your specification is in the form "name" (because of the missing dash) and there is no package with a name matching "kernel*3.18.3*". Also in the second query, it is assumed that the name must match "kernel*3.18.3". TBH, I don't know whether we should extend the forms of package specifications to support your case. The current behaviour seems to be safer to me. I mean, if we improve it, user wouldn't be able to query just package names as easily as now. -- Radek Holý Associate Software Engineer Software Management Team Red Hat Czech -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
