On 12 February 2015 at 12:53, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> wrote:
> On Qui, 2015-02-12 at 14:41 -0500, Corey Sheldon wrote: > > Aka patience and to be totally honest and blunt, if you have a > > alpha/beta tester group and or a solid forum/mailing list with updates > > to status this should seriously not be a setback 3 weeks on the other > > hand might qualify.....Appreciate the eagerness to partake in > > development /packaging but things happen from time to time learn to > > roll with the tides as they say > > yeah, but we should have some regularity, I don't like waiting without > knowing the delay, in this case is pushing to stable, is just for my > organization, to see what is in stable and what let in testing, and I > have been patient. > I realize we haven't have a branch in a while due to the long Fedora 20 cycle, but this is how things are done usually after a branch.. there can be up to a week delay for pushes as various things get ironed out. > But when someone else send a package to testing and I want test it, if > we don't have a push to testing, force me download packages manually . > The point here is push to testing should be more quickly than push to > stable . > > Thanks , > -- > Sérgio M. B. > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > -- Stephen J Smoogen.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct