On Fri, 20.02.15 11:04, Dennis Gilmore (den...@ausil.us) wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:36:17 +0100 > Lennart Poettering <mzerq...@0pointer.de> wrote: > > > On Fri, 20.02.15 16:24, Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > >> > Sorry for the inconvenience and feel free to add bugs to the > > > >> > tracker, which are caused by systemd changes and have to be > > > >> > fixed in other components. > > > >> > > > >> Are you going to start notifying deve@ of upcoming changes that > > > >> may impact other areas of the distro too rather than just land > > > >> them without notification or discussion? > > > > > > > > Oh god, stop this, will you? > > > > > > No, I mean the above in general for general changes you make that > > > affect the distro as a whole. You generally land them without > > > notification. > > > > I "generally" do that? Can you be more precise? > > A recent example, systemd decided that os-release needed to be moved > to /usr/lib/ I did not see any notification on devel@ nor was i > contacted directly. the first I heard of it was a third party person > filing a bug against fedora-release
While moving it is great, it's not really that important to move it. I mean, moving it is useful in the context of stateless systems that can boot up with empty /etc. However, Fedora is so far away from that, that we have tons of other things to fix first, before the os-release move would start to matter. We haven't posted a feature to make Fedora stateless in this sense, and hence also didn't ask for /etc/os-release to be moved. There are some upstream things to work on before we can propose such a Fedora change. So, thank you very much for moving it! But this is neither a change that would really need coordination, nor something we pushed for from our side. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
