15.03.2015 16:57, Michael Schwendt пишет: > On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:49:28 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> Right now, many issues/problems are interacting and affecting packages >> simultanously, which occasionally render fixing these issues quite >> complicated. >> >> So far I've hit: >> - GCC-5.0 >> - "Hardening" >> - boost upgrade >> - ImageMagick >> - autotool upgrade. >> >> Openly said, the situation on f23 is a mess. > Agreed. People run into failed builds, find out that a lib needs a rebuild > because of GCC C++ ABI issues. After the rebuild, runtime linking fails for > other dependencies, and they need a rebuild, too. This is non-trivial (and > dangerous) for larger dep-chains in the distribution. I'm also not sure how > many packagers even run Rawhide instead of F22 testing. The main question should it be done in such manner? May be it have worth run at least off-tree (without commits and versions bump) mass rebuild? It allow estimate amount of broken packages and see dependencies. Do we have resources to do so?
-- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
